Looking for a trusted network of high-net-worth peers? Apply now to join Long Angle, a vetted community of high-net-worth investors, entrepreneurs, and professionals. Access confidential discussions, live events, peer groups, and private market investment opportunities.

The retirement planning world is rife with debates. One of the bigger questions retirees face: Should you withdraw a fixed percentage of your portfolio annually or rely solely on dividends for income? The decision isn’t just a numbers game. It directly affects your lifetime income, legacy goals, and lifestyle choices.

The debate was highlighted in a recent community discussion, with various perspectives on the strategies. In this post, we’ll explore the nuances of the 3% and 4% withdrawal rules, examine the pros and cons of a dividend-focused approach, and delve into advanced or hybrid strategies that may help you achieve your financial goals. Understanding these options is essential whether you prioritize emotional comfort, maximizing experiences, or leaving a legacy.

Understanding the 3% and 4% Rules

Historical Roots

The 4% rule originated from the Trinity Study and research by financial advisor Bill Bengen. It states that retirees can withdraw 4% of their portfolio in the first year of retirement and adjust for inflation annually without running out of money over 30 years.

But some experts now advocate for a 3% rule, particularly for early retirees. The more conservative approach reflects concerns about lower future returns and increased longevity, among other factors.

Mechanics

The withdrawal rate is applied to the initial portfolio value and adjusted for inflation each year. The strategy often involves rebalancing across multiple asset classes to maintain a diversified portfolio. For example, if your portfolio starts at $1 million, a 4% withdrawal means taking $40,000 in year one and adjusting that amount based on inflation in subsequent years.

Why It’s Not One-Size-Fits-All

While the 4% rule offers a general guideline, factors like market returns, personal longevity, and spending needs can impact its effectiveness. Early retirees or those with variable expenses may find this strategy less reliable without adjustments.

The Dividend-Focused Approach

How Dividends Work

Dividend-paying stocks, funds, or ETFs distribute a portion of their earnings to shareholders. Retirees who rely on dividends essentially “eat the eggs but not the goose,” preserving their principal while living off the income generated.

Key Arguments For Dividends

Many retirees find psychological comfort in living off dividends without selling principal. Plus, dividend growth, especially from Dividend Aristocrats — stocks that raise their dividends yearly —can outpace inflation, providing a steady income stream over time.

Several participants in our discussion shared that they spend only the income generated from their investments, allowing the principal to grow. One member echoed this sentiment but admitted they were "trying to find the guts to spend more." The relatively conservative strategy appeals to those prioritizing financial security and the possibility of leaving a sizable inheritance.

But one member challenged the dividend approach and suggested that relying solely on dividends might lock up a substantial portion of your return on investment (ROI). “Some companies return much of the value they create back to shareholders in the form of dividends; others don’t and instead reinvest their profits into growing the business (and share price)."

Risks & Misconceptions

Relying solely on dividends isn’t without risks. Companies can cut dividends, and a dividend-focused portfolio may lack diversification. Also, non-dividend-paying stocks can offer attractive total-return benefits. It’s also a misconception that earning 4% in dividends is inherently superior to withdrawing 4% through a total-return approach.

The Psychological and Behavioral Side of Spending

Emotional Impact

Many retirees prefer dividend income to avoid the stress of “timing the market” or selling assets during downturns. The fear of tapping into principal—and the possibility of running out of money—can be a major psychological barrier.

Several members emphasized aligning financial decisions with personal values and life goals. One member posed a critical question: "What is your money for? Most people in this community can easily live on dividends and fixed income and let their assets grow. But what do you do with all those growing assets?" They advocated for finding a purpose for wealth that maximizes happiness and spreads it to others.

Spending Guilt & Underspending

An “only spend dividends” mindset can lead to underspending, leaving retirees with a ballooning estate but fewer experiences. Bill Perkins’ “Die With Zero” philosophy advocates for matching spending to life stages, ensuring retirees make the most of their money while they’re able to enjoy it.

That’s why one member shared a hybrid approach, using dividends and interest to cover annual spending while maintaining a large cash reserve for flexibility. They cited Perkins’ book, which questions the purpose of continually growing wealth without enjoying its benefits.

Another member agreed, stating, "In a lot of cases, you’ll just end up with tens of millions in the bank when you die. What’s exciting about that?" They encouraged practicing spending principles to overcome the psychological barrier of touching investments.

Behavioral Hacks

To overcome mental hurdles, retirees can adopt flexible withdrawal strategies or set guidelines for minimum principal drawdown. These approaches balance emotional comfort with financial efficiency.

High-Net-Worth Income & Spending Report

Long Angle's annual High-Net-Worth Income and Spending report analyzes income sources, expenses, savings strategies, and spending behaviors of high-net-worth households.

Access Annual Report »

Why the 4% Rule May No Longer Work for Everyone

Updated Research & Market Conditions

The 4% rule was based on historical data, but lower interest rates, shifting market conditions, and early-sequence risk have led some experts to question its reliability.

Controversies

Critics point to perceived flaws in the original Trinity Study and argue that its assumptions may not hold in today’s economic environment. However, these critiques often depend on individual circumstances.

Personal Circumstances

Earlier retirements, longer life expectancies, and rising healthcare costs all challenge the viability of a fixed withdrawal rate. Therefore, tailoring your strategy to your unique risk tolerance and goals is crucial.

Advanced Approaches and Hybrid Models

Combining Dividends + Percentage Withdrawals

A hybrid approach uses dividends to cover baseline expenses while topping up with strategic principal sales. This method allows retirees to maintain a balanced portfolio while addressing income needs.

Guardrail Strategies

Dynamic withdrawal strategies, like the Guyton-Klinger rules, adjust withdrawals based on market performance. For example, retirees may reduce withdrawals during market downturns to preserve their portfolios.

“Die With Zero” vs. Legacy-Focused

Retirees face a philosophical choice: prioritize maximizing experiences or ensuring intergenerational wealth. These goals often require different spending strategies.

The “7% Rule” (and Other High-Yield Approaches)

Some retirees pursue high-yield strategies, such as the “7% rule.” While potentially lucrative, such approaches carry elevated risks of depleting funds if returns fall short.

Asset Allocation & Diversification Considerations

Mitigating Dividend Cuts & Market Volatility

Diversification across sectors and asset classes helps mitigate risks associated with dividend cuts or market downturns. Index-based dividend strategies naturally rebalance away from underperforming stocks.

Real Estate, Private Equity, & Alternative Investments

High-net-worth individuals often include real estate, private equity, and alternative investments to balance growth, income, and liquidity needs.

Tax Planning

Tax efficiency is critical. Dividends and capital gains are taxed differently, and asset location (taxable vs. tax-advantaged accounts) plays a significant role. Retirees must also account for Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) on specific accounts.

Real-Life Scenarios & Case Studies

Case 1: Early Retiree Dividend Purist

This retiree lives off dividends, finding mental relief in “never selling.” But they face risks from concentrated holdings and potential dividend cuts.

Case 2: Traditional 4% Rule Adopter

This retiree adheres to the 4% rule. They manage sequence-of-returns risk but occasionally grapple with underspending or overspending concerns.

Case 3: Hybrid Investor / “Spend Some Principal”

This individual uses dividends for baseline expenses and occasionally sells shares for larger purchases or experiences, balancing income stability with flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Does the 4% Rule include dividends?

Yes, the 4% withdrawal generally includes all returns, including dividends and capital appreciation.

Why does the 4% Rule no longer work for some?

Updated research highlights factors like longer lifespans, rising medical costs, and market volatility, which challenge the rule’s assumptions.

Is it better to earn dividends or interest?

The answer depends on your risk profile, market conditions, tax situation, and personal preferences.

What is the 7% Rule for retirement?

This high-risk, high-reward approach targets a 7% withdrawal rate, which is suitable for certain investors but has a much greater potential for portfolio depletion.

Conclusion & Action Steps

Key Takeaways

Both dividend-focused and percentage-based strategies have pros and cons. Your choice should align with your personal goals, risk tolerance, and willingness to adapt over time.

Ultimately, the choice between dividends and percentage-based withdrawals depends on individual circumstances, risk tolerance, and financial goals. For some, enjoying life in the present outweighs the fear of depleting assets. "Being younger and having money/time to experience life feels like it shouldn’t be wasted," one member remarked.

For others, a conservative approach offers peace of mind and the satisfaction of leaving a legacy. One member summarized the balance well: "I do sleep at night with the first few years covered in short-term stuff. As my overall portfolio value increases, I feel like I can grind up the spend if I see visibility into how everything is performing."

Next Steps

To refine your plan, explore advanced modeling tools like ProjectionLab or EarlyRetirementNow’s SWR series. Consulting financial and tax advisors can also help tailor strategies to your needs. Tools like ProjectionLab helped one member “completely change my perspective for the better around spending.”

Another member referenced Big ERN’s "safe withdrawal rate" series. They use an adjusted percentage withdrawal model, drawing from cash reserves, dividends, and occasionally selling stocks or ETFs. "I’m not averse to selling some stocks/ETFs over time, and I have some capital losses I can use up for a while," they explained. That flexibility allows for a balanced approach to spending and portfolio management.

Conclusion

Whether you choose to spend based on dividends, a withdrawal percentage, or a combination of both, the key is to align your strategy with your financial goals and personal values. As we’ve seen, retirement planning is deeply personal and case-by-case. As one member put it, "My goal is to die with zero, having spent it all to maximize my lifestyle and experiences, not to hold the same amount of dollars I have now."

Managing wealth effectively becomes more straightforward with the guidance of a trusted community. The Long Angle network brings together high-net-worth individuals for engaging discussions, exclusive events, and valuable insights. Apply today to join a group of peers dedicated to achieving financial success and a fulfilling future.

Looking to expand your investment network?

Join Long Angle, a private community of high-net-worth investors. Together, we leverage our collective expertise and assets to access, diligence, and underwrite institutional-quality alternative investments.

APPLY NOW

3% Rule (or 4% Rule) vs. Dividends: Optimizing Your Retirement Spending Strategy

Table of Contents